tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4489671847543226645.post7433614258333939090..comments2023-06-27T05:30:55.361-07:00Comments on Kasper's Spyglass: Dirt Cheap OperaTedhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00917235846237638647noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4489671847543226645.post-79916146315884582092009-09-10T15:31:09.158-07:002009-09-10T15:31:09.158-07:00Die Dreigroschenoper premiered in 1928. That'...<i>Die Dreigroschenoper</i> premiered in 1928. That's 81 years ago, so it's not quite "four generations."<br /><br />Different countries have different rules for the length of time a copyright is enforceable, whether we like these rules or not, in the United States, rights to works published prior to 1978 are protected for 95 years. This means that the heirs to Brecht and Weill can collect royalties on any American production until 2023, where upon it becomes public domain. Now, this only covers Brecht's and Weill's authorship-- after 2023, one can do anything with the text or music in America so long as you do it in German! A translator's work is also copyrighted, so if I like Frank McGuinness' 1992 English translation, I have to pay royalties to him (or his heirs) up until 2087. To get around that, one needs to do ones own translation.<br /><br />It may be excessive, and it was mostly to allow large corporations to hold on to their most iconic intellectual property (Disney's ownership of Mickey Mouse, for instance,) the law also allowed for creators and their heirs to recover rights to creations that were unfairly acquired by these large corporations.<br /><br />But excessively long or not, that's an entirely different argument than citing Brecht's socialism. Socialists have always elected to choose with whom they share freely and from whom they demand payment.<br /><br />I probably wrote an account of seeing <i>Dirt Cheap Opera</i> (looking back on my records, I appear to be mistaken, it was in 2002, and the same performance <a href="http://www.aislesay.com/MA-DIRT.html" rel="nofollow">reviewed by Will Stackman</a>) but I probably lost it when my harddrive crashed in 2004. I certainly noted the same alienation effect caused by the characters not being consistently played by the same puppeteers that you did.Ian Thalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15348768867561450314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4489671847543226645.post-79872470962487573312009-09-10T14:00:13.954-07:002009-09-10T14:00:13.954-07:00Ian, thanks for the pointer to LXG: Century 1910; ...Ian, thanks for the pointer to <i>LXG: Century 1910</i>; I'll definitely look into that. <br /><br />As for <i>Threepenny Opera</i> and rights, the work was created 4 generations ago, and both Brecht and Weill have been dead and buried for over half a century. In my view, even the most generous argument for copyright should not extend beyond the deceased authors' offspring reaching the age of majority when they can work and support themselves. <i>Threepenny</i> in particular was shielded by copyright before Peter Schumann was born, and will likely still be shielded after he dies -- in my view that's plainly too long a span.<br /><br />Back to <i>Dirt Cheap Opera</i>, though -- do you have any surviving memories of the 2003 production? Are there any details from that performance which stand out for you?<br /><br />Morgão, thanks for identifying Sam! I've updated the blog entry with her surname.Tedhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00917235846237638647noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4489671847543226645.post-72516303115537742009-09-09T21:27:06.816-07:002009-09-09T21:27:06.816-07:00Sam Wilson. (Unless you're with the FBI, which...Sam <b>Wilson</b>. (Unless you're with the FBI, which case Sam's last name is certainly not Wilson.)Morgan FitzPatrick Andrewshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16828501977646782019noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4489671847543226645.post-44374127677984188982009-09-09T17:58:16.321-07:002009-09-09T17:58:16.321-07:00Apologies for referring to a "2007 cast"...Apologies for referring to a "2007 cast"; I meant the 2009 cast.Ian Thalhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15348768867561450314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4489671847543226645.post-88441175966582896292009-09-09T17:31:28.777-07:002009-09-09T17:31:28.777-07:00Why should it be surprising that there are intelle...Why should it be surprising that there are intellectual property rights associated with Bertold Brecht's works? The rights to his works would have been shared with his collaborators, in this case, Kurt Weill. He owned the rights when he was alive (and even when he resided in East Germany he received royalties from publication and production of his writings) indeed, this is how he would have made his living. The point is that between collaborators, translators, and heirs, there are quite a few people who have financial stakes in any production of <i>Three Penny Opera</i> (1928)-- and as wonderfully original a staging as <i>Dirt Cheap Opera</i> might be (I saw a production back in 2003 with a different cast, but this 2007 cast has capable performers) it is not sufficiently different from the Brecht/Weill collaboration to qualify as an independent work as Brecht/Weill are from John Gay's 1728 <i>Beggar's Opera</i> or Alan Moore and Kevin O'Neill's 2009 <i>League of Extraordinary Gentlemen: Century: 1910</i> is from <i>Three-Penny Opera</i>, from which it drew considerable inspiration.<br /><br />These are basic rights that exist to protect creative workers from being exploited by anyone with a printing press or the deed to an auditorium. <br /><br />Schumann and Bread and Puppet are not above using cease and desist orders to protect their intellectual property either.Ian Thalhttp://ianthal.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com